Jean-Luc Godard was born
in Paris in 1930. He grew up in Switzerland, in a bourgeois family
– his father was a private doctor, his mother came from a banking family.
A Swiss citizen, Godard returned to Paris in 1948, where he studied ethnology
at the Sorbonne.
At this time, he frequented
cinema clubs in the Latin Quarter of Paris where he met François
Truffaut and Jacques Rivette, with whom he would go on to form a new movement
in French cinema in the 1960s, the New Wave (La Nouvelle Vague).
In 1954, he Godard returned
to Switzerland to work as a construction worker. With the money he
earned, he made his first film, a short, about the construction of a dam,
Opérion
béton.
Back in Paris, he came to
prominence as a critic, writing articles for the influential “Cahiers
du cinéma”, in which he attacked the traditionalists and praised
innovative film makers.

Having made a few more short
films, he finally made his first full-length film in 1959: A bout de
souffle (a.k.a. Breathless). Overnight, Godard won widespread
acclaim as a film director, praised for his radical and innovative approach
to film-making. This film, along with Truffaut’s Les Quatre cents
coups, lay the foundation for the New Wave, the most exciting period
in French film cinema history.
Reception of Godard’s next
few films was mixed. Le Petit soldat was banned by the censor
for its references to the war in Algeria, whilst Une femme est une femme
(Godard’s first colour film) was a box office disaster. Les
Carabiniers was attacked by the critics and also fail to attract the
public. By contrast, Vivre sa vie was well-received by both
public and critics alike.
Godard’s popularity was established
in the mid-1960s with a string of popular and critically acclaimed films
(many featuring his wife at the time, Anna Karina). These included:
Alphaville,
Pierrot
le Fou and Masculin, féminin.

During this period, Godard’s
cinema shows a noticeable and gradual shift towards the abstract, in keeping
with the director’s constant desire to try out new cinematographic styles.
Deux ou trois choses que
je sais d'elle, La Chinoise and Week-end are amongst
Godard’s most incisive and critically acclaimed films, although significantly
less accessible than his earlier films. These films, and those which
followed, reflect Godard’s growing involvement with Maoist politics and
hostility towards American imperialism and commercialism. They were
also in tune with increasing social conscience which was beginning to stir
in France at the time, culminating in the demonstrations of May 1968.
The late 1960s saw Godard’s
retreat from mainstream cinema. For the next few years he would work
with a group of left-wing political activists, producing his own political
films. This era of Godard’s career is echoed in his 1972 film, Tout
va bien. The film, despite winning financial backing and targeted
at a mainstream audience, was an almighty flop.
Godard remained in the wilderness
for several more years, making films for his own amusement, before making
a comeback in the commercial arena with his 1979 film, Sauve qui peut.
Since, Godard has continued
to make films which tackle political, sociological and humanitist themes.
Although still revered by a section of the film critic community, his films
have by now become so inaccessible and far removed from the mainstream
that they appeal to a minority of cinema goers. Some of his recent
films, such as Prénom Carmen and Hélas pour moi,
continue to arouse positive noises from the critics.
Godard’s most amibitious
project to date has been his multi-part Histore du cinéma,
a unique study of the history of French cinema.
Whilst mainstream cinema
becomes increasingly commercialised, Godard continues to make provocative
and original films, unhampered by the need to win the patronage of either
the public or some greedy film company executive.
By sticking doggedly to his
auteurist principles throughout his career, Jean-Luc Godard has given us
some of the most imaginative and thought-provoking films ever made.
No film director has been so successful at expressing his creativity and
ideological concerns. His is a uniquely honest and inspired approach
to film making. |